PLG
Price
$1.39
Change
-$0.01 (-0.71%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
15 days until earnings call
SLSR
Price
$3.10
Change
-$0.11 (-3.43%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:31 PM (EDT)
92 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PLG vs SLSR

Header iconPLG vs SLSR Comparison
Open Charts PLG vs SLSRBanner chart's image
Platinum Group Metals
Price$1.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.71%)
Volume$5.44K
CapitalizationN/A
Solaris Resources
Price$3.10
Change-$0.11 (-3.43%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
PLG vs SLSR Comparison Chart
Loading...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLG vs. SLSR commentary
Dec 27, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLG is a Buy and SLSR is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2024
Stock price -- (PLG: $1.40 vs. SLSR: $3.21)
Brand notoriety: PLG and SLSR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLG: 101% vs. SLSR: 2%
Market capitalization -- PLG: $118.83M vs. SLSR: $0
PLG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $118.83M. SLSR’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLSR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLSR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLSR is a better buy in the long-term than PLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLSR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SLSR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLSR is a better buy in the short-term than PLG.

Price Growth

PLG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.69% price change this week, while SLSR (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLG is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.

SLSR is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLG YTD gains are higher at: 22.807 vs. SLSR (5.246).
PLGSLSRPLG / SLSR
Capitalization119MN/A-
EBITDA-5.09MN/A-
Gain YTD22.8075.246435%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash7.11MN/A-
Total Debt302KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLG vs SLSR: Fundamental Ratings
PLG
SLSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLSR's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PLG (96) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLSR’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

PLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLSR (100) in the null industry. This means that PLG’s stock grew similarly to SLSR’s over the last 12 months.

PLG's SMR Rating (94) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLSR (100) in the null industry. This means that PLG’s stock grew similarly to SLSR’s over the last 12 months.

SLSR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PLG (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLSR’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

PLG's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLSR (100) in the null industry. This means that PLG’s stock grew similarly to SLSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLGSLSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA462.2831.68
+7.36%
Tesla
AAPL258.202.93
+1.15%
Apple
SPY601.306.61
+1.11%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME31.140.24
+0.78%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X99299.195000623.101560
+0.63%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

PLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLG has been loosely correlated with ASM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLG jumps, then ASM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLG
1D Price
Change %
PLG100%
+9.38%
ASM - PLG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
CDE - PLG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
MAG - PLG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
SBSW - PLG
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
EXK - PLG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
More

SLSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLSR has been loosely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLSR jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLSR
1D Price
Change %
SLSR100%
+1.42%
CDE - SLSR
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
PLG - SLSR
44%
Loosely correlated
+9.38%
SAND - SLSR
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
HL - SLSR
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
MAG - SLSR
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More