PLFRF vs SHKLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLFRF is a Hold and SHKLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLFRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHKLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PLFRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SHKLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
PLFRF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -10.82% price change this week, while SHKLY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.49%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-2.57% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| PLFRF | SHKLY | PLFRF / SHKLY | |
| Capitalization | 863M | 5.78B | 15% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 4.5B | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 48.202 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 11.43 | 23.26 | 49% |
| Revenue | N/A | 59.3B | - |
| Total Cash | 95.6M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 582M | N/A | - |
PLFRF | SHKLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 51 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SHKLY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as PLFRF (6). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.
SHKLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLFRF (100). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.
PLFRF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SHKLY (31). This means that PLFRF’s stock grew similarly to SHKLY’s over the last 12 months.
SHKLY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PLFRF (72). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.
SHKLY's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as PLFRF (80). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
PLFRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PLFRF and MAQAF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLFRF and MAQAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLFRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLFRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MAQAF - PLFRF | 7% Poorly correlated | -11.61% | ||
| OUKPF - PLFRF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRAUF - PLFRF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PUODY - PLFRF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| SHKLY - PLFRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SHKLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHKLY and CEAD have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHKLY and CEAD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHKLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHKLY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CEAD - SHKLY | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.93% | ||
| OUKPY - SHKLY | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| PKCOY - SHKLY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNYYF - SHKLY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SEXHF - SHKLY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||