PLFRF
Price
$40.00
Change
+$6.00 (+17.65%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
862.77M
SHKLY
Price
$147.85
Change
+$23.85 (+19.23%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLFRF vs SHKLY

Header iconPLFRF vs SHKLY Comparison
Open Charts PLFRF vs SHKLYBanner chart's image
Palfinger AG
Price$40.00
Change+$6.00 (+17.65%)
Volume$290
Capitalization862.77M
Sinotruk Hong Kong
Price$147.85
Change+$23.85 (+19.23%)
Volume$2.91K
Capitalization5.78B
PLFRF vs SHKLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHKLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLFRF vs. SHKLY commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLFRF is a Hold and SHKLY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PLFRF: $40.00 vs. SHKLY: $147.85)
Brand notoriety: PLFRF and SHKLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLFRF: 111% vs. SHKLY: 1310%
Market capitalization -- PLFRF: $862.77M vs. SHKLY: $5.78B
PLFRF [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $862.77M. SHKLY’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $5.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLFRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHKLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PLFRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHKLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHKLY is a better buy in the long-term than PLFRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLFRF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHKLY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLFRF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SHKLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHKLY is a better buy in the short-term than PLFRF.

Price Growth

PLFRF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHKLY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +19.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+0.98% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHKLY($5.78B) has a higher market cap than PLFRF($863M). SHKLY has higher P/E ratio than PLFRF: SHKLY (23.26) vs PLFRF (11.43). PLFRF YTD gains are higher at: 81.818 vs. SHKLY (22.817).
PLFRFSHKLYPLFRF / SHKLY
Capitalization863M5.78B15%
EBITDAN/A4.5B-
Gain YTD81.81822.817359%
P/E Ratio11.4323.2649%
RevenueN/A59.3B-
Total Cash95.6MN/A-
Total Debt582MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLFRF vs SHKLY: Fundamental Ratings
PLFRF
SHKLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
8032
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1355
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHKLY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PLFRF (23). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.

SHKLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLFRF (100). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.

SHKLY's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLFRF (80). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.

PLFRF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SHKLY (44). This means that PLFRF’s stock grew similarly to SHKLY’s over the last 12 months.

PLFRF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHKLY (55). This means that PLFRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHKLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLFRFSHKLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHKLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAFE26.650.24
+0.91%
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF
FBOT30.510.26
+0.87%
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
JIVE69.810.25
+0.37%
JPMorgan International Value ETF
NEA11.010.01
+0.09%
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
UST42.63-0.34
-0.79%
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury

PLFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLFRF and MAQAF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLFRF and MAQAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLFRF
1D Price
Change %
PLFRF100%
N/A
MAQAF - PLFRF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OUKPF - PLFRF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRAUF - PLFRF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUODY - PLFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHKLY - PLFRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHKLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHKLY and VAPE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHKLY and VAPE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHKLY
1D Price
Change %
SHKLY100%
N/A
VAPE - SHKLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
OUKPY - SHKLY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
PKCOY - SHKLY
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.79%
SNYYF - SHKLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEXHF - SHKLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More