Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PLDR vs SCHG
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts PLDR vs SCHG
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$37.51
Change+$0.19 (+0.51%)
Volume$29.92K
Net Assets882.66M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$33.11
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
Volume$4.05M
Net Assets53.57B
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PLDR vs. SCHG commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLDR is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 53.6B vs. PLDR (883M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: SCHG (19.152) vs PLDR (12.510). PLDR was incepted earlier than SCHG: PLDR (5 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR has a higher turnover SCHG (27.00) vs SCHG (27.00).
| PLDR | SCHG | PLDR / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 12.510 | 19.152 | 65% |
| Net Assets | 883M | 53.6B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 27.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.36 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PLDR | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | 12 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLDR has been loosely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLDR jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | N/A | ||
| TPG - PLDR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| VIK - PLDR | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| ONON - PLDR | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| PLD - PLDR | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| V - PLDR | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More | ||||