Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PLDR vs SCHG
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts PLDR vs SCHG
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$34.33
Change+$0.12 (+0.35%)
Volume$6.26K
Net Assets737.9M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$29.82
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
Volume$31.67K
Net Assets45.42B
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PLDR vs. SCHG commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLDR is a Hold and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 45.4B vs. PLDR (738M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: SCHG (6.925) vs PLDR (2.608). PLDR was incepted earlier than SCHG: PLDR (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| PLDR | SCHG | PLDR / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 2.608 | 6.925 | 38% |
| Net Assets | 738M | 45.4B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 3.00 | 1,067% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.39 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PLDR | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLDR has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLDR jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| CRH - PLDR | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| TPG - PLDR | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| ADI - PLDR | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| VIK - PLDR | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| STX - PLDR | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| META - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||