Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PLDR vs SCHG
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts PLDR vs SCHG
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$37.67
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
Volume$800
Net Assets854.79M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$32.83
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$26.79K
Net Assets52.35B
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PLDR vs. SCHG commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLDR is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 52.3B vs. PLDR (855M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: SCHG (17.965) vs PLDR (12.394). PLDR was incepted earlier than SCHG: PLDR (5 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| PLDR | SCHG | PLDR / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 12.394 | 17.965 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 855M | 52.3B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 3.00 | 1,067% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.36 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PLDR | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 69% | 16 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLDR has been loosely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLDR jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| TPG - PLDR | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| VIK - PLDR | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| ONON - PLDR | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| PLD - PLDR | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.01% | ||
| V - PLDR | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||