Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PLDR vs SCHG
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts PLDR vs SCHG
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$35.71
Change-$0.12 (-0.33%)
Volume$75.65K
Net Assets792.02M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$31.69
Change-$0.17 (-0.53%)
Volume$9.17M
Net Assets50.26B
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PLDR vs. SCHG commentary
Sep 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLDR is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 50.3B vs. PLDR (792M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: SCHG (14.042) vs PLDR (7.101). PLDR was incepted earlier than SCHG: PLDR (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| PLDR | SCHG | PLDR / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 7.101 | 14.042 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 792M | 50.3B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 3.00 | 1,067% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.37 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PLDR | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IDE | 12.25 | 0.10 | +0.82% |
| Voya Infrastructure Industrials AND Materials Fund | |||
| PFEB | 39.53 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Bffr ETF™ Feb | |||
| CPST | 26.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Sep | |||
| HOMZ | 47.04 | -0.17 | -0.36% |
| The Hoya Capital Housing ETF | |||
| IXUS | 82.00 | -0.51 | -0.62% |
| iShares Core MSCI Total Intl Stk ETF | |||
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PLDR and V have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLDR and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| V - PLDR | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
| ECL - PLDR | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
| AZN - PLDR | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| GSK - PLDR | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| OTIS - PLDR | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||