Advertisement
PLD vs SFSHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLD is a Buy and SFSHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFSHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SFSHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFSHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SFSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
PLD (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а +2.47% price change this week, while SFSHF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
PLD is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+1.39% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| PLD | SFSHF | PLD / SFSHF | |
| Capitalization | 122B | 2.43B | 5,019% |
| EBITDA | 7.19B | 352M | 2,044% |
| Gain YTD | 3.306 | 14.063 | 24% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.34 | 15.89 | 241% |
| Revenue | 8.74B | 227M | 3,849% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 16.9M | - |
| Total Debt | 35.3B | 1.03B | 3,437% |
PLD | SFSHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 99 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 49 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SFSHF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLD (94) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SFSHF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLD’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFSHF (99) in the null industry. This means that PLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.
SFSHF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as PLD (82) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SFSHF’s stock grew similarly to PLD’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SFSHF (42) in the null industry. This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to SFSHF’s over the last 12 months.
SFSHF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLD (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SFSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLD’s over the last 12 months.
| PLD | SFSHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 54% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 39% |
Advertisement
PLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLD has been closely correlated with FR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLD jumps, then FR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD | 100% | +1.70% | ||
| FR - PLD | 89% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| EGP - PLD | 88% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TRNO - PLD | 87% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| STAG - PLD | 86% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| REXR - PLD | 84% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
SFSHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SFSHF and BYLOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFSHF and BYLOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFSHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFSHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BYLOF - SFSHF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UNBLF - SFSHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| LNSPF - SFSHF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHTH - SFSHF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLD - SFSHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||