Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PLCDX vs RBBAX
PLCDX vs RBBAX Comparison
Open Charts PLCDX vs RBBAX
Aristotle Portfolio OptimizatinCns I2
Price$10.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.63M
Columbia Income Builder A
Price$12.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets847.81M
PLCDX vs RBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PLCDX vs. RBBAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLCDX is a Hold and RBBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBBAX has more cash in the bank: 848M vs. PLCDX (125M). PLCDX (3.88) and RBBAX (3.81) have matching dividends . PLCDX was incepted earlier than RBBAX: PLCDX (13 years) vs RBBAX (20 years). RBBAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than PLCDX (0.83). PLCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RBBAX (18.00). PLCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBAX: PLCDX (0) vs RBBAX (2000). RBBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. PLCDX (9.67). RBBAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.61 vs. PLCDX (5.76).
| PLCDX | RBBAX | PLCDX / RBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.97 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.97 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.171 | 10.776 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 125M | 848M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 3.81 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 10.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.33 | 26.64 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.76 | 13.61 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.98 | 55.14 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement