Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PLCDX vs RBBAX
PLCDX vs RBBAX Comparison
Open Charts PLCDX vs RBBAX
Aristotle Portfolio OptimizatinCns I2
Price$10.58
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.79M
Columbia Income Builder A
Price$12.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets856M
PLCDX vs RBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PLCDX vs. RBBAX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLCDX is a Hold and RBBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBBAX has more cash in the bank: 856M vs. PLCDX (125M). PLCDX pays higher dividends than RBBAX: PLCDX (4.11) vs RBBAX (3.85). PLCDX was incepted earlier than RBBAX: PLCDX (13 years) vs RBBAX (20 years). RBBAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than PLCDX (0.83). PLCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RBBAX (18.00). PLCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBAX: PLCDX (0) vs RBBAX (2000). RBBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. PLCDX (10.36). RBBAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.43 vs. PLCDX (5.89).
| PLCDX | RBBAX | PLCDX / RBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.97 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.97 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.954 | 1.297 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 125M | 856M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.11 | 3.85 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 11.45 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.53 | 24.32 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.89 | 13.43 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.05 | 62.66 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement