Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PLCDX vs RBBAX
PLCDX vs RBBAX Comparison
Open Charts PLCDX vs RBBAX
Aristotle Portfolio OptimizatinCns I2
Price$10.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.87M
Columbia Income Builder A
Price$12.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.6M
PLCDX vs RBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PLCDX vs. RBBAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLCDX is a Hold and RBBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBBAX has more cash in the bank: 850M vs. PLCDX (125M). PLCDX (3.88) and RBBAX (3.81) have matching dividends . PLCDX was incepted earlier than RBBAX: PLCDX (13 years) vs RBBAX (20 years). RBBAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than PLCDX (0.83). PLCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RBBAX (18.00). PLCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBAX: PLCDX (0) vs RBBAX (2000). RBBAX (7.97) and PLCDX (7.82) have marching annual gain over last year. RBBAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.43 vs. PLCDX (6.09).
| PLCDX | RBBAX | PLCDX / RBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.97 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.97 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.768 | 10.508 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 125M | 850M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 3.81 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.82 | 7.97 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.54 | 23.60 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.09 | 13.43 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.34 | 52.98 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement