Advertisement
PLAG vs UTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLAG is a Hold and UTZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PLAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLAG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PLAG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UTZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
PLAG (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +1.14% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +1.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1015.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
UTZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.13% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.57% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| PLAG | UTZ | PLAG / UTZ | |
| Capitalization | 12.9M | 1.12B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -6.5M | 146M | -4% |
| Gain YTD | -31.792 | -16.619 | 191% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 61.57 | - |
| Revenue | 6.07M | 1.43B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.15M | 54.6M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 3.17M | 1.05B | 0% |
PLAG | UTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLAG's Valuation (47) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (48) in the null industry. This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as PLAG (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to PLAG’s over the last 12 months.
UTZ's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PLAG (97) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to PLAG’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (62) in the null industry. This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (100) in the null industry. This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| PLAG | UTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HSWRX | 20.97 | 0.14 | +0.67% |
| Hartford Schroders International Stk R3 | |||
| HDQVX | 18.31 | 0.11 | +0.60% |
| Janus Henderson International Div S | |||
| FMFCX | 86.01 | -0.06 | -0.07% |
| Fidelity Advisor Materials C | |||
| WIMVX | 12.11 | -0.02 | -0.16% |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Glb All Cp Inst | |||
| NQQQX | 44.08 | -0.22 | -0.50% |
| Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Institutional | |||
PLAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLAG has been closely correlated with STKH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLAG jumps, then STKH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLAG | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| STKH - PLAG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| BON - PLAG | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| NOMD - PLAG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| PETZ - PLAG | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| UTZ - PLAG | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.19% | ||
More | ||||
UTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.