PLAB
Price
$34.27
Change
+$0.33 (+0.97%)
Updated
Feb 5, 03:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TER
Price
$272.12
Change
+$3.05 (+1.13%)
Updated
Feb 5, 03:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.14B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLAB vs TER

Header iconPLAB vs TER Comparison
Open Charts PLAB vs TERBanner chart's image
Photronics
Price$34.27
Change+$0.33 (+0.97%)
Volume$720
Capitalization2B
Teradyne
Price$272.12
Change+$3.05 (+1.13%)
Volume$1.51K
Capitalization42.14B
PLAB vs TER Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLAB vs. TER commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLAB is a Hold and TER is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (PLAB: $33.93 vs. TER: $269.07)
Brand notoriety: PLAB: Not notable vs. TER: Notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLAB: 69% vs. TER: 224%
Market capitalization -- PLAB: $2B vs. TER: $42.14B
PLAB [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $2B. TER’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $42.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $545.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $42.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTER’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PLAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TER’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLAB is a better buy in the long-term than TER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLAB’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TER’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLAB’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TER’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TER is a better buy in the short-term than PLAB.

Price Growth

PLAB (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -5.59% price change this week, while TER (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +7.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +61.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLAB is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

TER is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-3.19% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TER($42.1B) has a higher market cap than PLAB($2B). TER has higher P/E ratio than PLAB: TER (77.54) vs PLAB (14.87). TER YTD gains are higher at: 39.011 vs. PLAB (6.031). TER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 648M vs. PLAB (299M). PLAB has more cash in the bank: 588M vs. TER (298M). PLAB has less debt than TER: PLAB (5.96M) vs TER (68.8M). TER has higher revenues than PLAB: TER (2.86B) vs PLAB (849M).
PLABTERPLAB / TER
Capitalization2B42.1B5%
EBITDA299M648M46%
Gain YTD6.03139.01115%
P/E Ratio14.8777.5419%
Revenue849M2.86B30%
Total Cash588M298M197%
Total Debt5.96M68.8M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLAB vs TER: Fundamental Ratings
PLAB
TER
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6821
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3936
SMR RATING
1..100
6352
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
381
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
218
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLAB's Valuation (62) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as TER (82). This means that PLAB’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.

TER's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as PLAB (39). This means that TER’s stock grew similarly to PLAB’s over the last 12 months.

TER's SMR Rating (52) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as PLAB (63). This means that TER’s stock grew similarly to PLAB’s over the last 12 months.

TER's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLAB (38). This means that TER’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLAB’s over the last 12 months.

TER's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as PLAB (21). This means that TER’s stock grew similarly to PLAB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLABTER
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TER
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTHY14.080.03
+0.21%
First Trust High Yield Opportunities 2027 Term Fund
SDCP25.74N/A
N/A
Virtus Newfleet Short Dur Cor Pls Bd ETF
QSIG48.93-0.02
-0.05%
WisdomTree US Shrt-Term Corp Bd
ESG160.33-0.58
-0.36%
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select ETF
TCAF37.59-0.22
-0.58%
T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec Eq ETF

PLAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLAB has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLAB jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLAB
1D Price
Change %
PLAB100%
-3.58%
KLIC - PLAB
83%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
AMKR - PLAB
80%
Closely correlated
-5.13%
AMAT - PLAB
76%
Closely correlated
-6.61%
TER - PLAB
75%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
RMBS - PLAB
71%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
More

TER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TER has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TER jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TER
1D Price
Change %
TER100%
-4.92%
ASML - TER
75%
Closely correlated
-4.07%
STM - TER
74%
Closely correlated
+5.28%
TXN - TER
72%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
RMBS - TER
72%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
COHU - TER
71%
Closely correlated
-3.63%
More