Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PJFM vs VOT
PJFM vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts PJFM vs VOT
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
Price$58.85
Change-$1.86 (-3.06%)
Volume$398
Net Assets15.49M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$284.75
Change+$2.49 (+0.88%)
Volume$198.21K
Net Assets33.11B
PJFM vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PJFM vs. VOT commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PJFM is a Hold and VOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 33.1B vs. PJFM (15.5M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than PJFM: VOT (11.290) vs PJFM (1.333). PJFM was incepted earlier than VOT: PJFM (2 years) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than PJFM (0.49). PJFM has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| PJFM | VOT | PJFM / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 1.333 | 11.290 | 12% |
| Net Assets | 15.5M | 33.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.07 | 700% |
| Turnover | 101.00 | 21.00 | 481% |
| Yield | 0.77 | 0.64 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PJFM | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 42% | 7 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 43% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PJFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJFM has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PJFM jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PJFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJFM | 100% | N/A | ||
| WSC - PJFM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| CBRE - PJFM | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WTFC - PJFM | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| RL - PJFM | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| ALSN - PJFM | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 84% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| APO - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| CCL - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||