PIPR
Price
$322.98
Change
+$1.73 (+0.54%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.71B
74 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$111.64
Change
+$1.34 (+1.21%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
11.41B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PIPR vs SF

Header iconPIPR vs SF Comparison
Open Charts PIPR vs SFBanner chart's image
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$322.98
Change+$1.73 (+0.54%)
Volume$130.38K
Capitalization5.71B
Stifel Financial
Price$111.64
Change+$1.34 (+1.21%)
Volume$341.12K
Capitalization11.41B
PIPR vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PIPR vs. SF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIPR is a Buy and SF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (PIPR: $322.98 vs. SF: $111.64)
Brand notoriety: PIPR and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PIPR: 78% vs. SF: 47%
Market capitalization -- PIPR: $5.71B vs. SF: $11.41B
PIPR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $5.71B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PIPR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than PIPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PIPR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.66% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($11.4B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($5.71B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than SF: PIPR (27.21) vs SF (21.64). PIPR YTD gains are higher at: 9.365 vs. SF (6.218). PIPR has less debt than SF: PIPR (116M) vs SF (1.52B). SF has higher revenues than PIPR: SF (5B) vs PIPR (1.49B).
PIPRSFPIPR / SF
Capitalization5.71B11.4B50%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.3656.218151%
P/E Ratio27.2121.64126%
Revenue1.49B5B30%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt116M1.52B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIPR vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
PIPR
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2020
SMR RATING
1..100
4412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7627
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIPR's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (44) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (76) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PIPRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZDIIX27.040.18
+0.67%
Zacks Dividend Institutional
AICFX64.080.28
+0.44%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F1
CFXRX14.550.01
+0.07%
Columbia Flexible Capital Income Inst2
CMCRX43.06-0.09
-0.21%
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx R6
SHRAX107.52-0.26
-0.24%
ClearBridge Growth A

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
+0.54%
EVR - PIPR
90%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
MC - PIPR
89%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
SF - PIPR
87%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
GS - PIPR
86%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
JEF - PIPR
84%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+1.21%
EVR - SF
88%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
GS - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
MS - SF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
JEF - SF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
More