PILBF
Price
$1.01
Change
+$0.09 (+9.78%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.68B
WRSLF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
204.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PILBF vs WRSLF

Header iconPILBF vs WRSLF Comparison
Open Charts PILBF vs WRSLFBanner chart's image
PILBARA MINERALS
Price$1.01
Change+$0.09 (+9.78%)
Volume$97.54K
Capitalization9.68B
Winsome Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization204.1M
PILBF vs WRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PILBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PILBF vs. WRSLF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PILBF is a Buy and WRSLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PILBF: $1.01 vs. WRSLF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: PILBF and WRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PILBF: 238% vs. WRSLF: 9%
Market capitalization -- PILBF: $9.68B vs. WRSLF: $204.1M
PILBF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.68B. WRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $204.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PILBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PILBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PILBF is a better buy in the long-term than WRSLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PILBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRSLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PILBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WRSLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PILBF is a better buy in the short-term than WRSLF.

Price Growth

PILBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +15.75% price change this week, while WRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PILBF($9.69B) has a higher market cap than WRSLF($204M). PILBF YTD gains are higher at: -24.286 vs. WRSLF (-64.353). PILBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.51B vs. WRSLF (-10.63M). PILBF has more cash in the bank: 86.2M vs. WRSLF (13.5M).
PILBFWRSLFPILBF / WRSLF
Capitalization9.69B204M4,748%
EBITDA2.51B-10.63M-23,639%
Gain YTD-24.286-64.35338%
P/E Ratio8.57N/A-
Revenue3.05BN/A-
Total Cash86.2M13.5M639%
Total Debt176MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PILBF: Fundamental Ratings
PILBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PILBFWRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PILBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRYQX20.130.25
+1.26%
BNY Mellon Research Growth Y
FOVAX27.080.25
+0.93%
First Trust/Confluence Small Cap Val A
GLVCX74.190.67
+0.91%
Invesco Global Focus C
FIIIX22.530.07
+0.31%
Fidelity Advisor International Growth I
IGNCX13.25-0.01
-0.08%
Macquarie Natural Resources C

PILBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PILBF has been loosely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PILBF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PILBF
1D Price
Change %
PILBF100%
+9.60%
LYSDY - PILBF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
PMETF - PILBF
50%
Loosely correlated
+4.84%
GLNCY - PILBF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
SOUHY - PILBF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
MALRY - PILBF
45%
Loosely correlated
+7.44%
More

WRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRSLF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRSLF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRSLF
1D Price
Change %
WRSLF100%
N/A
IVPAF - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
ERMAY - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSDY - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
CRECF - WRSLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
PILBF - WRSLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.60%
More