Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWBX
PIIMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWBX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$34.60
Change-$0.40 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.54B
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
PIIMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. PIIMX (5.55B). PIIMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PIIMX (0.25) vs RNWBX (0.12). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PIIMX (1.08). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PIIMX (28.50). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWBX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.92 vs. RNWBX (20.32). PIIMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.93 vs. RNWBX (21.37).
| PIIMX | RNWBX | PIIMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.67 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.081 | 27.152 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.55B | 76.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.12 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.92 | 20.32 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.55 | 47.10 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.93 | 21.37 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement