Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWAX
PIIMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWAX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$37.59
Change+$2.89 (+8.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.72B
American Funds New World R1
Price$94.09
Change+$2.64 (+2.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
PIIMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. PIIMX (6.72B). PIIMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: PIIMX (0.92) vs RNWAX (0.53). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PIIMX (1.08). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. PIIMX (32.30). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWAX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.99 vs. RNWAX (26.30). PIIMX return over 5 years is better than : 17.28 vs. RNWAX (7.02).
| PIIMX | RNWAX | PIIMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.66 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.528 | 6.005 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.72B | 75.5B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.53 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.99 | 26.30 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.38 | 38.84 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.28 | 7.02 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers