Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWAX
PIIMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWAX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$34.60
Change-$0.40 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.54B
American Funds New World R1
Price$92.44
Change-$1.20 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
PIIMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. PIIMX (5.55B). PIIMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: PIIMX (0.25) vs RNWAX (0.00). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PIIMX (1.08). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PIIMX (28.50). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWAX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.92 vs. RNWAX (20.34). PIIMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.93 vs. RNWAX (21.33).
| PIIMX | RNWAX | PIIMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.66 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.081 | 27.176 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.55B | 76.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.92 | 20.34 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.55 | 47.05 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.93 | 21.33 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement