PIFMY
Price
$23.25
Change
+$0.51 (+2.24%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
SGLJF
Price
$15.04
Change
-$2.56 (-14.55%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PIFMY vs SGLJF

Header iconPIFMY vs SGLJF Comparison
Open Charts PIFMY vs SGLJFBanner chart's image
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur TBK
Price$23.25
Change+$0.51 (+2.24%)
Volume$307
Capitalization4.01B
Strauss Group
Price$15.04
Change-$2.56 (-14.55%)
Volume$564
Capitalization3.15B
PIFMY vs SGLJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PIFMY vs. SGLJF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIFMY is a Hold and SGLJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PIFMY: $23.25 vs. SGLJF: $15.04)
Brand notoriety: PIFMY and SGLJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PIFMY: 56% vs. SGLJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PIFMY: $4.01B vs. SGLJF: $3.15B
PIFMY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.01B. SGLJF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PIFMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PIFMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIFMY is a better buy in the long-term than SGLJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PIFMY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PIFMY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

PIFMY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while SGLJF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIFMY($4.01B) has a higher market cap than SGLJF($3.15B). SGLJF has higher P/E ratio than PIFMY: SGLJF (20.08) vs PIFMY (6.33). PIFMY YTD gains are higher at: 1.687 vs. SGLJF (0.000). PIFMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.21T vs. SGLJF (1.55B). PIFMY has more cash in the bank: 51.84T vs. SGLJF (436M). SGLJF has less debt than PIFMY: SGLJF (2.47B) vs PIFMY (71.29T). PIFMY has higher revenues than SGLJF: PIFMY (118.33T) vs SGLJF (7.25B).
PIFMYSGLJFPIFMY / SGLJF
Capitalization4.01B3.15B127%
EBITDA24.21T1.55B1,562,194%
Gain YTD1.6870.000-
P/E Ratio6.3320.0832%
Revenue118.33T7.25B1,632,179%
Total Cash51.84T436M11,889,679%
Total Debt71.29T2.47B2,892,211%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIFMY vs SGLJF: Fundamental Ratings
PIFMY
SGLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8342
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
1142
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6174
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGLJF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFMY (19). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew similarly to PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGLJF (100). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (42). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (74). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLJF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFMY (88). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PIFMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGLOX18.810.21
+1.13%
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer
PPQMX6.110.05
+0.83%
Principal MidCap Growth III R3
OGLYX104.070.83
+0.80%
Invesco Global Y
JGERX13.140.08
+0.61%
JHancock Global Equity R2
FEBAX15.130.04
+0.27%
First Eagle Global Income Builder A

PIFMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIFMY and PAVS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIFMY and PAVS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFMY
1D Price
Change %
PIFMY100%
+2.24%
PAVS - PIFMY
26%
Poorly correlated
+27.92%
SUEZY - PIFMY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORKLY - PIFMY
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
TATYF - PIFMY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMF - PIFMY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGLJF has been loosely correlated with AKEJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGLJF jumps, then AKEJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLJF
1D Price
Change %
SGLJF100%
N/A
AKEJF - SGLJF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SUEZY - SGLJF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRBZF - SGLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMY - SGLJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
RSGUF - SGLJF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
More