PHR
Price
$22.90
Change
+$0.66 (+2.97%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
QLYS
Price
$127.64
Change
-$0.27 (-0.21%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.61B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PHR vs QLYS

Header iconPHR vs QLYS Comparison
Open Charts PHR vs QLYSBanner chart's image
Phreesia
Price$22.90
Change+$0.66 (+2.97%)
Volume$510.22K
Capitalization1.37B
Qualys
Price$127.64
Change-$0.27 (-0.21%)
Volume$303.81K
Capitalization4.61B
PHR vs QLYS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PHR vs. QLYS commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHR is a Hold and QLYS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (PHR: $22.90 vs. QLYS: $127.64)
Brand notoriety: PHR and QLYS are both not notable
PHR represents the Services to the Health Industry, while QLYS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PHR: 53% vs. QLYS: 97%
Market capitalization -- PHR: $1.37B vs. QLYS: $4.61B
PHR [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $1.37B. QLYS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $47.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.26B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PHR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PHR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QLYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the long-term than PHR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PHR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QLYS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the short-term than PHR.

Price Growth

PHR (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -2.18% price change this week, while QLYS (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.34%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHR is expected to report earnings on Dec 15, 2025.

QLYS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.82% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Computer Communications (-0.16% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLYS($4.61B) has a higher market cap than PHR($1.37B). QLYS (-8.972) and PHR (-8.983) have similar YTD gains . QLYS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 214M vs. PHR (7.13M). QLYS has more cash in the bank: 370M vs. PHR (98.3M). PHR has less debt than QLYS: PHR (12.8M) vs QLYS (55.3M). QLYS has higher revenues than PHR: QLYS (637M) vs PHR (450M).
PHRQLYSPHR / QLYS
Capitalization1.37B4.61B30%
EBITDA7.13M214M3%
Gain YTD-8.983-8.972100%
P/E RatioN/A25.43-
Revenue450M637M71%
Total Cash98.3M370M27%
Total Debt12.8M55.3M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PHR vs QLYS: Fundamental Ratings
PHR
QLYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5454
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
9524
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PHR's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QLYS (79) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PHR’s stock grew somewhat faster than QLYS’s over the last 12 months.

QLYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PHR (100) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to PHR’s over the last 12 months.

QLYS's SMR Rating (24) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHR (95) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew significantly faster than PHR’s over the last 12 months.

QLYS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PHR (64) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to PHR’s over the last 12 months.

QLYS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHR (100) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHRQLYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSVEX29.380.39
+1.35%
LSV Value Equity
STSGX13.720.08
+0.59%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Inv
BSGIX15.690.04
+0.26%
Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Institutional
REEBX63.18-0.08
-0.13%
American Funds EUPAC R2E
ALGYX115.56-2.18
-1.85%
Alger Focus Equity Y

PHR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHR has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHR jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHR
1D Price
Change %
PHR100%
+2.97%
QTWO - PHR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
QLYS - PHR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
DJCO - PHR
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
ONTF - PHR
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
ADSK - PHR
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More

QLYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLYS
1D Price
Change %
QLYS100%
-0.21%
TENB - QLYS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
CCSI - QLYS
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
DJCO - QLYS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
EVCM - QLYS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
PCTY - QLYS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
More