PHIN
Price
$54.52
Change
+$0.19 (+0.35%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STRT
Price
$79.86
Change
+$3.77 (+4.95%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
334.24M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PHIN vs STRT

Header iconPHIN vs STRT Comparison
Open Charts PHIN vs STRTBanner chart's image
PHINIA
Price$54.52
Change+$0.19 (+0.35%)
Volume$262.57K
Capitalization2.1B
STRATTEC SECURITY
Price$79.86
Change+$3.77 (+4.95%)
Volume$62.36K
Capitalization334.24M
PHIN vs STRT Comparison Chart in %
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PHIN vs. STRT commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHIN is a Hold and STRT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PHIN: $54.33 vs. STRT: $76.05)
Brand notoriety: PHIN and STRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PHIN: 16% vs. STRT: 37%
Market capitalization -- PHIN: $2.1B vs. STRT: $334.24M
PHIN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.1B. STRT’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $334.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PHIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STRT is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHIN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PHIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STRT is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while STRT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

STRT is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.85% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.1B) has a higher market cap than STRT($334M). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than STRT: PHIN (24.45) vs STRT (13.94). STRT YTD gains are higher at: 84.587 vs. PHIN (14.669). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 452M vs. STRT (40.4M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 347M vs. STRT (84.6M). STRT has less debt than PHIN: STRT (8M) vs PHIN (1.04B). PHIN has higher revenues than STRT: PHIN (3.36B) vs STRT (565M).
PHINSTRTPHIN / STRT
Capitalization2.1B334M628%
EBITDA452M40.4M1,119%
Gain YTD14.66984.58717%
P/E Ratio24.4513.94175%
Revenue3.36B565M594%
Total Cash347M84.6M410%
Total Debt1.04B8M13,038%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STRT: Fundamental Ratings
STRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHINSTRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KAIKY13.61N/A
N/A
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
CHDRY170.00N/A
N/A
Christian Dior S.E.
HKTVY3.60N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Technology Venture Company Ltd
IZOZF0.24N/A
N/A
Izotropic Corporation
LNXSY4.09N/A
N/A
Lanxess Ag

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been closely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
-0.24%
ALV - PHIN
66%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
VC - PHIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
BWA - PHIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
APTV - PHIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
AXL - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More

STRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRT has been loosely correlated with APTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STRT jumps, then APTV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STRT
1D Price
Change %
STRT100%
-1.78%
APTV - STRT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
ATMU - STRT
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
LEA - STRT
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
DAN - STRT
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
PHIN - STRT
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More