PHIN
Price
$71.25
Change
-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.74B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSUP
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
3.09M
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PHIN vs SSUP

Header iconPHIN vs SSUP Comparison
Open Charts PHIN vs SSUPBanner chart's image
PHINIA
Price$71.25
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$150
Capitalization2.74B
Superior Industries International
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization3.09M
PHIN vs SSUP Comparison Chart in %
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSUP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PHIN vs. SSUP commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHIN is a Buy and SSUP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (PHIN: $71.27 vs. SSUP: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: PHIN and SSUP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PHIN: 147% vs. SSUP: 115%
Market capitalization -- PHIN: $2.74B vs. SSUP: $3.09M
PHIN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.74B. SSUP’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $81.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PHIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSUP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSUP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than SSUP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSUP’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PHIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SSUP’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSUP is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.17% price change this week, while SSUP (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

SSUP is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.25% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.74B) has a higher market cap than SSUP($3.09M). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 13.686 vs. SSUP (0.000). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. SSUP (-34.51M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. SSUP (85.3M). SSUP has less debt than PHIN: SSUP (553M) vs PHIN (1.05B). PHIN has higher revenues than SSUP: PHIN (3.43B) vs SSUP (1.16B).
PHINSSUPPHIN / SSUP
Capitalization2.74B3.09M88,616%
EBITDA418M-34.51M-1,211%
Gain YTD13.6860.000-
P/E Ratio31.96N/A-
Revenue3.43B1.16B295%
Total Cash349M85.3M409%
Total Debt1.05B553M189%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SSUP: Fundamental Ratings
SSUP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHINSSUP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSUP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGXFX17.660.02
+0.11%
Hartford Global Impact F
FRESX38.66N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Investment Port
IAFMX18.02-0.11
-0.61%
F/m Investments Large Cap Focused Inv
PAGLX44.28-0.43
-0.96%
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Adv
JAENX138.65-1.37
-0.98%
Janus Henderson Enterprise T

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been closely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+2.11%
ALV - PHIN
67%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
BWA - PHIN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
APTV - PHIN
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
VC - PHIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
AXL - PHIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
More

SSUP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSUP and INEO have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSUP and INEO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSUP
1D Price
Change %
SSUP100%
N/A
INEO - SSUP
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
PHIN - SSUP
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
CREV - SSUP
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
ATMU - SSUP
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
MKDW - SSUP
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
More