Advertisement
PHI vs TEO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHI is a Hold and TEO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PHI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PHI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PHI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TEO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PHI (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +2.66% price change this week, while TEO (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -4.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
PHI is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
TEO is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.08% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| PHI | TEO | PHI / TEO | |
| Capitalization | 5.14B | 5.75B | 89% |
| EBITDA | 117B | 1.05T | 11% |
| Gain YTD | 8.418 | 9.991 | 84% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.25 | 108.62 | 9% |
| Revenue | 219B | 6T | 4% |
| Total Cash | 10.4B | 672B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 358B | 5.49T | 7% |
PHI | TEO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PHI's Valuation (12) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEO (82) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that PHI’s stock grew significantly faster than TEO’s over the last 12 months.
TEO's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as PHI (74) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that TEO’s stock grew similarly to PHI’s over the last 12 months.
PHI's SMR Rating (36) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEO (91) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that PHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEO’s over the last 12 months.
TEO's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as PHI (50) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that TEO’s stock grew similarly to PHI’s over the last 12 months.
TEO's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHI (55) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that TEO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHI’s over the last 12 months.
| PHI | TEO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 61% | 13 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
PHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHI has been loosely correlated with TLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHI jumps, then TLK could also see price increases.
TEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TEO and LUMN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TEO and LUMN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEO | 100% | -2.44% | ||
| LUMN - TEO | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.26% | ||
| PHI - TEO | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.80% | ||
| S - TEO | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IDCC - TEO | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.66% | ||
| IHS - TEO | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||