It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PHI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PHI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
PHI (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -8.64% price change this week, while TEF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -3.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.28%.
PHI is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
TEF is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
PHI | TEF | PHI / TEF | |
Capitalization | 5.27B | 25.4B | 21% |
EBITDA | 109B | 10.3B | 1,058% |
Gain YTD | 1.334 | 14.542 | 9% |
P/E Ratio | 11.18 | 13.97 | 80% |
Revenue | 211B | 40.7B | 518% |
Total Cash | 17.1B | 7.67B | 223% |
Total Debt | 302B | 44.1B | 685% |
PHI | TEF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PHI's Valuation (10) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as TEF (13). This means that PHI’s stock grew similarly to TEF’s over the last 12 months.
PHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEF (100). This means that PHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEF’s over the last 12 months.
PHI's SMR Rating (39) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEF (100). This means that PHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEF’s over the last 12 months.
TEF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as PHI (63). This means that TEF’s stock grew similarly to PHI’s over the last 12 months.
TEF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHI (97). This means that TEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHI’s over the last 12 months.
PHI | TEF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago52% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 3 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago67% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PHI and RCI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PHI and RCI's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEF has been loosely correlated with VOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TEF jumps, then VOD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TEF | 100% | +0.47% | ||
VOD - TEF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
LBTYA - TEF | 38% Loosely correlated | +4.62% | ||
LBTYK - TEF | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.10% | ||
TU - TEF | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
VIV - TEF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
More |