PHCUF
Price
$5.15
Change
-$0.04 (-0.77%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
128.95M
SGIOF
Price
$18.05
Change
+$0.43 (+2.44%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
12.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PHCUF vs SGIOF

Header iconPHCUF vs SGIOF Comparison
Open Charts PHCUF vs SGIOFBanner chart's image
Photocure ASA
Price$5.15
Change-$0.04 (-0.77%)
Volume$200
Capitalization128.95M
Shionogi & Co
Price$18.05
Change+$0.43 (+2.44%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization12.4B
PHCUF vs SGIOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PHCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PHCUF vs. SGIOF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHCUF is a Hold and SGIOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PHCUF: $5.15 vs. SGIOF: $18.05)
Brand notoriety: PHCUF and SGIOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PHCUF: 39% vs. SGIOF: 40%
Market capitalization -- PHCUF: $128.95M vs. SGIOF: $12.4B
PHCUF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $128.95M. SGIOF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $12.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PHCUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGIOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PHCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGIOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGIOF is a better buy in the long-term than PHCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHCUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGIOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PHCUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGIOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGIOF is a better buy in the short-term than PHCUF.

Price Growth

PHCUF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SGIOF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+2.02% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGIOF($12.4B) has a higher market cap than PHCUF($129M). PHCUF has higher P/E ratio than SGIOF: PHCUF (500.00) vs SGIOF (9.57). SGIOF YTD gains are higher at: 47.830 vs. PHCUF (-8.036). SGIOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 242B vs. PHCUF (-2.74M). SGIOF has more cash in the bank: 563B vs. PHCUF (246M). PHCUF has less debt than SGIOF: PHCUF (6.25M) vs SGIOF (9.41B). SGIOF has higher revenues than PHCUF: SGIOF (427B) vs PHCUF (418M).
PHCUFSGIOFPHCUF / SGIOF
Capitalization129M12.4B1%
EBITDA-2.74M242B-0%
Gain YTD-8.03647.830-17%
P/E Ratio500.009.575,225%
Revenue418M427B0%
Total Cash246M563B0%
Total Debt6.25M9.41B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PHCUF vs SGIOF: Fundamental Ratings
PHCUF
SGIOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
892
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
932
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGIOF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHCUF (100). This means that SGIOF’s stock grew significantly faster than PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

SGIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PHCUF (100). This means that SGIOF’s stock grew similarly to PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

SGIOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHCUF (89). This means that SGIOF’s stock grew significantly faster than PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

SGIOF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PHCUF (54). This means that SGIOF’s stock grew similarly to PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

PHCUF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SGIOF (32). This means that PHCUF’s stock grew similarly to SGIOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHCUFSGIOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPTFX88.451.19
+1.36%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap A
GSMGX13.990.13
+0.94%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C
BPIRX14.530.08
+0.55%
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
CBEJX11.140.05
+0.45%
Allspring Large Cap Value CL R6
DURIX14.33-0.06
-0.42%
DWS ESG International Core Eq Instl

PHCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHCUF has been loosely correlated with HLTRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHCUF jumps, then HLTRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHCUF
1D Price
Change %
PHCUF100%
N/A
HLTRF - PHCUF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INCR - PHCUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.41%
ELAN - PHCUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
MKKGY - PHCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
CRYM - PHCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
More

SGIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGIOF and ROMJF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGIOF and ROMJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGIOF
1D Price
Change %
SGIOF100%
N/A
ROMJF - SGIOF
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.20%
TEVJF - SGIOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFOSF - SGIOF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGEDF - SGIOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHCUF - SGIOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More