PHCUF
Price
$6.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
128.95M
ROMJF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
19.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PHCUF vs ROMJF

Header iconPHCUF vs ROMJF Comparison
Open Charts PHCUF vs ROMJFBanner chart's image
Photocure ASA
Price$6.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization128.95M
Rubicon Organics
Price$0.32
Change+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Volume$126.54K
Capitalization19.9M
PHCUF vs ROMJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PHCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PHCUF vs. ROMJF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHCUF is a Hold and ROMJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PHCUF: $6.00 vs. ROMJF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: PHCUF and ROMJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PHCUF: 35% vs. ROMJF: 440%
Market capitalization -- PHCUF: $128.95M vs. ROMJF: $19.9M
PHCUF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $128.95M. ROMJF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $19.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PHCUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROMJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PHCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ROMJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHCUF is a better buy in the long-term than ROMJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHCUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROMJF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PHCUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ROMJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHCUF is a better buy in the short-term than ROMJF.

Price Growth

PHCUF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ROMJF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -2.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.51% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHCUF($129M) has a higher market cap than ROMJF($19.9M). PHCUF YTD gains are higher at: 7.143 vs. ROMJF (-3.524). ROMJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.21M vs. PHCUF (-2.74M). PHCUF has more cash in the bank: 246M vs. ROMJF (7.6M). PHCUF has less debt than ROMJF: PHCUF (6.25M) vs ROMJF (10.4M). PHCUF has higher revenues than ROMJF: PHCUF (418M) vs ROMJF (39.2M).
PHCUFROMJFPHCUF / ROMJF
Capitalization129M19.9M648%
EBITDA-2.74M1.21M-227%
Gain YTD7.143-3.524-203%
P/E Ratio500.00N/A-
Revenue418M39.2M1,066%
Total Cash246M7.6M3,237%
Total Debt6.25M10.4M60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PHCUF vs ROMJF: Fundamental Ratings
PHCUF
ROMJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5074
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ROMJF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHCUF (100). This means that ROMJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

ROMJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PHCUF (100). This means that ROMJF’s stock grew similarly to PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

PHCUF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as ROMJF (90). This means that PHCUF’s stock grew similarly to ROMJF’s over the last 12 months.

PHCUF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ROMJF (60). This means that PHCUF’s stock grew similarly to ROMJF’s over the last 12 months.

PHCUF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ROMJF (100). This means that PHCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than ROMJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHCUFROMJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRNWF0.07N/A
+6.32%
Greenlane Renewables Inc.
MEPDF15.90N/A
N/A
Medipal Holdings Corp.
SHLLF0.93N/A
N/A
Shelf Drilling Ltd.
ZDZT1.92N/A
N/A
Zhengduozhe Technology Inc
TERRF10.00N/A
N/A
Terna Rete Elettrica Nazionale SPA

PHCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHCUF has been loosely correlated with HLTRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHCUF jumps, then HLTRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHCUF
1D Price
Change %
PHCUF100%
N/A
HLTRF - PHCUF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
INCR - PHCUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
ELAN - PHCUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
MKKGY - PHCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
CRYM - PHCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ROMJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ROMJF and PHCUF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ROMJF and PHCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROMJF
1D Price
Change %
ROMJF100%
+0.53%
PHCUF - ROMJF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCLOF - ROMJF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGIOF - ROMJF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.77%
SGIOY - ROMJF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
RSCI - ROMJF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More