PH
Price
$719.15
Change
+$7.69 (+1.08%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
71.37B
25 days until earnings call
SCWO
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.02 (+10.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
167.16M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PH vs SCWO

Header iconPH vs SCWO Comparison
Open Charts PH vs SCWOBanner chart's image
Parker-Hannifin
Price$719.15
Change+$7.69 (+1.08%)
Volume$360.53K
Capitalization71.37B
374Water
Price$0.21
Change+$0.02 (+10.53%)
Volume$851.62K
Capitalization167.16M
PH vs SCWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PH vs. SCWO commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PH is a Buy and SCWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PH: $719.15 vs. SCWO: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: PH and SCWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PH: 56% vs. SCWO: 42%
Market capitalization -- PH: $71.37B vs. SCWO: $167.16M
PH [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $71.37B. SCWO’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $167.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PH is a better buy in the long-term than SCWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCWO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCWO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PH is a better buy in the short-term than SCWO.

Price Growth

PH (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +3.97% price change this week, while SCWO (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -49.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

PH is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SCWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+2.92% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PH($71.4B) has a higher market cap than SCWO($167M). PH YTD gains are higher at: 13.655 vs. SCWO (-69.763). PH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.82B vs. SCWO (-7M). PH has more cash in the bank: 394M vs. SCWO (12.8M). SCWO has less debt than PH: SCWO (478K) vs PH (11.8B). PH has higher revenues than SCWO: PH (19.8B) vs SCWO (1.65M).
PHSCWOPH / SCWO
Capitalization71.4B167M42,754%
EBITDA4.82B-7M-68,865%
Gain YTD13.655-69.763-20%
P/E Ratio27.22N/A-
Revenue19.8B1.65M1,197,822%
Total Cash394M12.8M3,078%
Total Debt11.8B478K2,468,619%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PH vs SCWO: Fundamental Ratings
PH
SCWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9100
SMR RATING
1..100
3598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1196
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCWO's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as PH (86) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that SCWO’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.

PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCWO (100) in the null industry. This means that PH’s stock grew significantly faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.

PH's SMR Rating (35) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCWO (98) in the null industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.

PH's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCWO (96) in the null industry. This means that PH’s stock grew significantly faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.

PH's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCWO (100) in the null industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHSCWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCRIF0.05N/A
N/A
CLEAN ENERGY TRANSITION INC.
GLABF0.53N/A
N/A
GEMINA LABORATORIES LTD.
FLUIF24.81N/A
N/A
Fluidra SA
WCHNF0.22N/A
N/A
West China Cement Ltd.
PUBGY27.17-0.40
-1.45%
Publicis Groupe S.A.

PH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PH
1D Price
Change %
PH100%
+1.08%
ITT - PH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
DOV - PH
84%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
EMR - PH
81%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
FLS - PH
79%
Closely correlated
+2.41%
IR - PH
78%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
More

SCWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCWO and GTES have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCWO and GTES's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCWO
1D Price
Change %
SCWO100%
+8.63%
GTES - SCWO
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
PH - SCWO
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
ITT - SCWO
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
DOV - SCWO
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
MIR - SCWO
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More