PGZFF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
54.49M
TWOSF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PGZFF vs TWOSF

Header iconPGZFF vs TWOSF Comparison
Open Charts PGZFF vs TWOSFBanner chart's image
Pan Global Resource
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.75K
Capitalization54.49M
T2 METALS
Price$0.10
Change+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization6.2M
PGZFF vs TWOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PGZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGZFF vs. TWOSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGZFF is a Hold and TWOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PGZFF: $0.11 vs. TWOSF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: PGZFF and TWOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGZFF: 2% vs. TWOSF: 10%
Market capitalization -- PGZFF: $54.49M vs. TWOSF: $6.2M
PGZFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $54.49M. TWOSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGZFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTWOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PGZFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TWOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PGZFF is a better buy in the long-term than TWOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PGZFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWOSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PGZFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TWOSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PGZFF and TWOSF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PGZFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.50% price change this week, while TWOSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGZFF($54.5M) has a higher market cap than TWOSF($6.2M). PGZFF YTD gains are higher at: 46.361 vs. TWOSF (-30.404). TWOSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.22M vs. PGZFF (-11.57M). PGZFF has more cash in the bank: 6.09M vs. TWOSF (1.31M). PGZFF (0) and TWOSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PGZFFTWOSFPGZFF / TWOSF
Capitalization54.5M6.2M879%
EBITDA-11.57M-1.22M952%
Gain YTD46.361-30.404-152%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.09M1.31M466%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGZFF vs TWOSF: Fundamental Ratings
PGZFF
TWOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4288
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGZFF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (59). This means that PGZFF’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

PGZFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TWOSF (100). This means that PGZFF’s stock grew similarly to TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as PGZFF (98). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to PGZFF’s over the last 12 months.

PGZFF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWOSF (88). This means that PGZFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TWOSF's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as PGZFF (100). This means that TWOSF’s stock grew similarly to PGZFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGZFFTWOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PGZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBGLY13.970.23
+1.67%
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.
RELV2.31N/A
N/A
Reliv International, Inc.
ADPPF0.35N/A
N/A
ADLER GROUP S A
TKECF3.70N/A
N/A
Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings
WDGJF0.39N/A
N/A
Wood Group (John) Plc.

PGZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZFF and GUELF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZFF and GUELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGZFF
1D Price
Change %
PGZFF100%
N/A
GUELF - PGZFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALMTF - PGZFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
TWOSF - PGZFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUUFF - PGZFF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
PNPNF - PGZFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More

TWOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TWOSF and GUELF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWOSF and GUELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWOSF
1D Price
Change %
TWOSF100%
N/A
GUELF - TWOSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABAT - TWOSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
FPRGF - TWOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGZFF - TWOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMYZF - TWOSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-11.01%
More