| PGZ | SCHH | PGZ / SCHH | |
| Gain YTD | 14.571 | 3.005 | 485% |
| Net Assets | 76M | 8.39B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 0.07 | 3,743% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 8.00 | 363% |
| Yield | 6.50 | 3.03 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| PGZ | SCHH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 76% | 14 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZ and DLR have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZ and DLR's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHH has been closely correlated with STAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHH jumps, then STAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHH | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| STAG - SCHH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| UDR - SCHH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| EQR - SCHH | 84% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| REG - SCHH | 83% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| FR - SCHH | 83% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||