Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGAHX
PGWCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGAHX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$33.20
Change-$0.51 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
PGWCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. PGWCX (1.53B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: RGAHX (0.50) vs PGWCX (0.00). PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: PGWCX (41 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGAHX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. PGWCX (1.47). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.84 vs. PGWCX (0.97).
| PGWCX | RGAHX | PGWCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.44 | 391% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.44 | 391% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.501 | 5.147 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 306B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 7.38 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.77 | 53.85 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.97 | 49.84 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement