Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGAFX
PGWCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGAFX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$34.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$81.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
PGWCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PGWCX (1.85B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: RGAFX (0.53) vs PGWCX (0.00). PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGAFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. PGWCX (2.69). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.03 vs. PGWCX (-10.84).
| PGWCX | RGAFX | PGWCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.34 | 506% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.34 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.113 | 9.285 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.69 | 6.08 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.98 | 68.01 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.84 | 24.03 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.64 | 97.51 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement