Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGACX
PGWCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGACX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$37.52
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
PGWCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. PGWCX (1.77B). RGACX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: RGACX (0.07) vs PGWCX (0.00). PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGACX (23 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGACX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. PGWCX (6.65). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. PGWCX (-10.86).
| PGWCX | RGACX | PGWCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.94 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.94 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.838 | 17.655 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.65 | 11.01 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.17 | 70.57 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.86 | 37.85 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.96 | 96.78 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement