Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGROX vs RNPAX
PGROX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts PGROX vs RNPAX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth A
Price$73.35
Change+$0.46 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$67.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
PGROX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGROX vs. RNPAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGROX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGROX (1.03B). PGROX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: PGROX (0.14) vs RNPAX (0.00). PGROX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: PGROX (32 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PGROX (1.12). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGROX (13.83). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGROX: RNPAX (250) vs PGROX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. PGROX (-0.63). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. PGROX (19.84).
| PGROX | RNPAX | PGROX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.49 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.49 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.705 | 18.359 | 64% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.63 | 11.51 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.51 | 57.67 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.84 | 29.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.84 | 87.53 | 48% |