Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$56.96
Change+$0.35 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGRCX (1.03B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (0.70) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. PGRCX (-4.12). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. PGRCX (8.15).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.990 | 19.326 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.12 | 13.09 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.92 | 62.51 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.15 | 36.47 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.94 | 100.70 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement