Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$57.55
Change-$0.85 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.14
Change-$1.23 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (0.69) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. PGRCX (-2.16). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.27 vs. PGRCX (7.44).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.796 | 21.486 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 165B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | 14.98 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.84 | 51.80 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.44 | 35.27 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.48 | 103.58 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement