Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$46.97
Change-$0.30 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.11
Change-$0.44 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGRCX (1.01B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (1.27) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (31 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.48 vs. PGRCX (-7.59). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.51 vs. PGRCX (-12.24).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.837 | 2.226 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.59 | 18.48 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.03 | 48.43 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.24 | 21.51 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.25 | 130.64 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement