Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPEX
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPEX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$57.55
Change-$0.85 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$72.60
Change-$1.21 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPEX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPEX (0.46) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). RNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPEX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.98 vs. PGRCX (-3.31). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 31.36 vs. PGRCX (5.87).
| PGRCX | RNPEX | PGRCX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.76 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.76 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.140 | 19.192 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 165B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.31 | 12.98 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.23 | 49.44 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.87 | 31.36 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.10 | 95.16 | 22% |