Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPEX
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPEX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$46.97
Change-$0.30 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$70.70
Change-$0.43 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGRCX (1.01B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPEX (1.00) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PGRCX (31 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). RNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPEX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.01 vs. PGRCX (-7.59). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 19.62 vs. PGRCX (-12.24).
| PGRCX | RNPEX | PGRCX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.76 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.76 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.837 | 2.227 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.59 | 18.01 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.03 | 46.72 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.24 | 19.62 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.25 | 126.16 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers