Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPBX
PGRCX vs RNPBX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPBX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$55.41
Change+$0.15 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New Perspective R2
Price$66.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
PGRCX vs RNPBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). PGRCX pays higher dividends than RNPBX: PGRCX (0.02) vs RNPBX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPBX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPBX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPBX (1.50). RNPBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPBX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.80 vs. PGRCX (-3.58). RNPBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.92 vs. PGRCX (13.99).
| PGRCX | RNPBX | PGRCX / RNPBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.50 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.970 | 14.162 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.58 | 15.80 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.93 | 41.87 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.99 | 36.92 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.26 | 77.00 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement