Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPBX
PGRCX vs RNPBX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPBX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$53.07
Change-$0.79 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
American Funds New Perspective R2
Price$62.71
Change-$0.76 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
PGRCX vs RNPBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPBX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. PGRCX (1B). PGRCX pays higher dividends than RNPBX: PGRCX (0.02) vs RNPBX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPBX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPBX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPBX (1.50). RNPBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPBX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. PGRCX (-10.08). RNPBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.11 vs. PGRCX (16.37).
| PGRCX | RNPBX | PGRCX / RNPBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.50 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.410 | 8.307 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 151B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.08 | 8.63 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.23 | 39.87 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.37 | 42.11 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.54 | 67.74 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement