Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPAX
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPAX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$46.20
Change-$11.00 (-19.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets993.39M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$65.41
Change-$2.38 (-3.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGRCX (993M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPAX (0.38) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: PGRCX (31 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PGRCX (11.23). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPAX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. PGRCX (-11.98). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.20 vs. PGRCX (-16.93).
| PGRCX | RNPAX | PGRCX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.49 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.49 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.816 | 1.537 | -53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.98 | 11.57 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.26 | 36.72 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.93 | 11.20 | -151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.31 | 113.55 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement