Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBGX
PGPRX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBGX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$26.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$36.90
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
PGPRX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. PGPRX (2.2B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBGX (2.15) vs PGPRX (1.36). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: PGPRX (22 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBGX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBGX (250). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. PGPRX (6.98). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. PGPRX (33.24).
| PGPRX | RLBGX | PGPRX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.25 | 472% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.25 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.382 | 8.259 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 8.24 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.52 | 36.31 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.24 | 43.50 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.79 | 68.54 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers