Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBGX
PGPRX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBGX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$26.98
Change+$0.10 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.23
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
PGPRX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PGPRX (2.22B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBGX (2.15) vs PGPRX (1.36). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBGX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBGX (250). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.64 vs. PGPRX (9.80). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.65 vs. PGPRX (31.81).
| PGPRX | RLBGX | PGPRX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.25 | 472% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.25 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.538 | 9.228 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.80 | 10.64 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.53 | 35.96 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.81 | 41.65 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.67 | 68.54 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement