Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBFX
PGPRX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$28.37
Change-$0.33 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
PGPRX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PGPRX (2.29B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBFX (1.97) vs PGPRX (1.58). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. PGPRX (9.16). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. PGPRX (31.62).
| PGPRX | RLBFX | PGPRX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.727 | 16.507 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.97 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 10.28 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.28 | 44.74 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.62 | 43.06 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.17 | 81.39 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement