Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBFX
PGPRX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$27.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
PGPRX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Hold and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PGPRX (2.3B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBFX (1.93) vs PGPRX (0.83). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PGPRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.39 vs. PGPRX (5.37). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.42 vs. PGPRX (27.57).
| PGPRX | RLBFX | PGPRX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.070 | 10.980 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.93 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.37 | 9.39 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.35 | 39.23 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.57 | 36.42 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.87 | 76.59 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement