Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBCX
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$27.05
Change-$1.28 (-4.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.13
Change-$0.57 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. PGPRX (2.3B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBCX (1.62) vs PGPRX (1.17). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PGPRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. PGPRX (6.06). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.82 vs. PGPRX (24.67).
| PGPRX | RLBCX | PGPRX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.89 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.89 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.933 | 2.445 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.62 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 10.97 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.59 | 35.49 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.67 | 33.82 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.93 | 84.49 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement