Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBCX
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$27.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.42
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Hold and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PGPRX (2.3B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBCX (1.44) vs PGPRX (0.83). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PGPRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.81 vs. PGPRX (5.37). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.04 vs. PGPRX (27.57).
| PGPRX | RLBCX | PGPRX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.89 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.89 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.070 | 10.439 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.44 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.37 | 8.81 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.35 | 36.85 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.57 | 33.04 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.87 | 69.88 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement