Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBCX
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$28.26
Change+$0.09 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. PGPRX (2.32B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBCX (1.49) vs PGPRX (1.27). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX (8.34) and PGPRX (8.29) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.24 vs. PGPRX (31.40).
| PGPRX | RLBCX | PGPRX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.593 | 14.364 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 265B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.49 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 8.34 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.04 | 49.26 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.40 | 40.24 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.54 | 72.18 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers