PGPHF
Price
$1357.47
Change
+$52.08 (+3.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
34.4B
TGOPY
Price
$13.43
Change
+$0.19 (+1.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
50.9B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PGPHF vs TGOPY

Header iconPGPHF vs TGOPY Comparison
Open Charts PGPHF vs TGOPYBanner chart's image
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
Price$1357.47
Change+$52.08 (+3.99%)
Volume$28
Capitalization34.4B
3i Group
Price$13.43
Change+$0.19 (+1.44%)
Volume$240.09K
Capitalization50.9B
PGPHF vs TGOPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGPHF vs. TGOPY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPHF is a StrongBuy and TGOPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PGPHF: $1357.47 vs. TGOPY: $13.43)
Brand notoriety: PGPHF and TGOPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGPHF: 36% vs. TGOPY: 71%
Market capitalization -- PGPHF: $34.4B vs. TGOPY: $50.9B
PGPHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $34.4B. TGOPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $50.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGPHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTGOPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PGPHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TGOPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGOPY is a better buy in the long-term than PGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PGPHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGOPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PGPHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGOPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGOPY is a better buy in the short-term than PGPHF.

Price Growth

PGPHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.54% price change this week, while TGOPY (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGOPY is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGOPY($50.9B) has a higher market cap than PGPHF($34.4B). PGPHF has higher P/E ratio than TGOPY: PGPHF (23.80) vs TGOPY (7.68). TGOPY YTD gains are higher at: 21.317 vs. PGPHF (2.430).
PGPHFTGOPYPGPHF / TGOPY
Capitalization34.4B50.9B68%
EBITDA1.45BN/A-
Gain YTD2.43021.31711%
P/E Ratio23.807.68310%
Revenue2.02BN/A-
Total Cash289MN/A-
Total Debt2.14BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGPHF vs TGOPY: Fundamental Ratings
PGPHF
TGOPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
732
SMR RATING
1..100
2142
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7156
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGPHF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as TGOPY (25). This means that PGPHF’s stock grew similarly to TGOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGPHF (73). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew significantly faster than PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as TGOPY (42). This means that PGPHF’s stock grew similarly to TGOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PGPHF (60). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as PGPHF (71). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGPHFTGOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSAT31.230.54
+1.76%
Globalstar Inc
MVST2.560.03
+1.19%
Microvast Holdings
BATL1.090.01
+0.93%
Battalion Oil Corp
CHTR261.501.99
+0.77%
Charter Communications
VTYX2.52-0.08
-3.08%
Ventyx Biosciences

PGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPHF and JBAXY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPHF and JBAXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGPHF
1D Price
Change %
PGPHF100%
+3.99%
JBAXY - PGPHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
TGOPY - PGPHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
IVSBF - PGPHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
ONEXF - PGPHF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
LBGUF - PGPHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TGOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGOPY has been loosely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGOPY jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGOPY
1D Price
Change %
TGOPY100%
+1.44%
IVZ - TGOPY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
AAMI - TGOPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.34%
CG - TGOPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
CCAP - TGOPY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
BN - TGOPY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More