Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBFX
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.10
Change-$0.34 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PGPCX (2.29B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBFX (1.97) vs PGPCX (1.14). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. PGPCX (8.62). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. PGPCX (28.25).
| PGPCX | RLBFX | PGPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.265 | 16.507 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.97 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.62 | 10.28 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.01 | 44.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.25 | 43.06 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.20 | 81.39 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement