Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBFX
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PGPCX (2.31B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBFX (1.93) vs PGPCX (0.49). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). PGPCX (10.07) and RLBFX (9.63) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.86 vs. PGPCX (32.94).
| PGPCX | RLBFX | PGPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.946 | 16.889 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.93 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 9.63 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.97 | 41.38 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.94 | 40.86 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.44 | 77.79 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement