Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBEX
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBEX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$26.80
Change-$1.25 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.33
Change-$0.56 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. PGPCX (2.29B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBEX (1.87) vs PGPCX (0.68). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PGPCX (27 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). PGPCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. PGPCX (5.48). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.56 vs. PGPCX (21.42).
| PGPCX | RLBEX | PGPCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.59 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.59 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.904 | 2.459 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.87 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 11.32 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.43 | 36.71 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.42 | 35.56 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.86 | 90.55 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement