Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBEX
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBEX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.10
Change-$0.34 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.99
Change-$0.49 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
PGPCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PGPCX (2.29B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBEX (1.71) vs PGPCX (1.14). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. PGPCX (8.62). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. PGPCX (28.25).
| PGPCX | RLBEX | PGPCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.265 | 16.221 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.71 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.62 | 9.94 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.01 | 43.51 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.25 | 41.28 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.20 | 80.23 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement