Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBCX
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$26.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.42
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Hold and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PGPCX (2.3B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBCX (1.44) vs PGPCX (0.49). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PGPCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.81 vs. PGPCX (4.95). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.04 vs. PGPCX (24.45).
| PGPCX | RLBCX | PGPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.89 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.89 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.654 | 10.439 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.44 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 8.81 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.35 | 36.85 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.45 | 33.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.52 | 69.88 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement