Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBCX
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$26.80
Change-$1.25 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.13
Change-$0.57 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. PGPCX (2.29B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBCX (1.62) vs PGPCX (0.68). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPCX (27 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PGPCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. PGPCX (5.48). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.82 vs. PGPCX (21.42).
| PGPCX | RLBCX | PGPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.89 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.89 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.904 | 2.445 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.62 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 10.97 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.43 | 35.49 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.42 | 33.82 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.86 | 84.49 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement