Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBCX
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.57
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
PGPCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PGPCX (2.31B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBCX (1.44) vs PGPCX (0.49). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). PGPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. RLBCX (8.93). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. PGPCX (32.94).
| PGPCX | RLBCX | PGPCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.946 | 16.253 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.44 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 8.93 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.97 | 39.00 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.94 | 37.26 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.44 | 71.11 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement