Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBBX
PGPCX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBBX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.44
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$39.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
PGPCX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Hold and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. PGPCX (2.32B). PGPCX (1.14) and RLBBX (1.09) have matching dividends . PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBBX (24 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBBX (250). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. PGPCX (8.62). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.96 vs. PGPCX (28.25).
| PGPCX | RLBBX | PGPCX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.265 | 15.500 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 268B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.09 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.62 | 9.11 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.01 | 40.59 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.25 | 36.96 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.20 | 70.07 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers