Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBBX
PGPCX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBBX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$26.80
Change-$1.25 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$38.04
Change-$0.58 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
PGPCX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. PGPCX (2.29B). RLBBX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBBX (1.23) vs PGPCX (0.68). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: PGPCX (27 years) vs RLBBX (24 years). PGPCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBBX (250). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. PGPCX (5.48). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 31.41 vs. PGPCX (21.42).
| PGPCX | RLBBX | PGPCX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.904 | 2.396 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.23 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 10.49 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.43 | 33.68 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.42 | 31.41 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.86 | 79.44 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement