Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBAX
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBAX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$27.06
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. PGPCX (2.24B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBAX (1.17) vs PGPCX (1.09). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBAX (250). PGPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. RLBAX (7.15). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. PGPCX (26.33).
| PGPCX | RLBAX | PGPCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.496 | 9.243 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.17 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 7.15 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.92 | 27.06 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.33 | 33.77 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.89 | 59.12 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers