Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBAX
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBAX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$25.63
Change-$0.19 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PGPCX (2.14B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBAX (1.23) vs PGPCX (1.05). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. PGPCX (3.93). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. PGPCX (28.60).
| PGPCX | RLBAX | PGPCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.725 | 4.085 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.23 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.93 | 4.45 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.21 | 30.02 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.60 | 34.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.71 | 51.23 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement