Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBAX
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBAX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$26.49
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. PGPCX (2.2B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBAX (1.18) vs PGPCX (1.01). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. PGPCX (6.48). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. PGPCX (29.79).
| PGPCX | RLBAX | PGPCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.138 | 7.651 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.18 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 7.00 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.48 | 32.45 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.79 | 37.04 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.68 | 58.01 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement