Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBAX
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBAX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$27.32
Change+$0.10 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. PGPCX (2.26B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBAX (1.15) vs PGPCX (0.93). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (9.12) and PGPCX (8.83) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. PGPCX (25.88).
| PGPCX | RLBAX | PGPCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.132 | 10.805 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | 9.12 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | 37.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.88 | 35.40 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.04 | 67.71 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement