PGOL
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.34M
PMCCF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
9.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PGOL vs PMCCF

Header iconPGOL vs PMCCF Comparison
Open Charts PGOL vs PMCCFBanner chart's image
Patriot Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Volume$5.6K
Capitalization7.34M
Peloton Minerals
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization9.11M
PGOL vs PMCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PGOL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGOL vs. PMCCF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGOL is a Hold and PMCCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (PGOL: $0.02 vs. PMCCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PGOL and PMCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGOL: 23% vs. PMCCF: 55%
Market capitalization -- PGOL: $7.34M vs. PMCCF: $9.11M
PGOL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.34M. PMCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $9.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGOL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PGOL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCCF is a better buy in the long-term than PGOL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PGOL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCCF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PGOL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PMCCF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCCF is a better buy in the short-term than PGOL.

Price Growth

PGOL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -38.19% price change this week, while PMCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.14% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCCF($9.11M) has a higher market cap than PGOL($7.35M). PMCCF has higher P/E ratio than PGOL: PMCCF (18.76) vs PGOL (7.87). PGOL YTD gains are higher at: 58.776 vs. PMCCF (28.696). PGOL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 920K vs. PMCCF (-558.87K). PGOL has more cash in the bank: 2.15M vs. PMCCF (51.2K). PGOL has higher revenues than PMCCF: PGOL (1.89M) vs PMCCF (0).
PGOLPMCCFPGOL / PMCCF
Capitalization7.35M9.11M81%
EBITDA920K-558.87K-165%
Gain YTD58.77628.696205%
P/E Ratio7.8718.7642%
Revenue1.89M0-
Total Cash2.15M51.2K4,205%
Total DebtN/A100K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGOL vs PMCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PGOL
PMCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
136
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGOL's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (86). This means that PGOL’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as PGOL (100). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew similarly to PGOL’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGOL (100). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PGOL’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PGOL (64). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew similarly to PGOL’s over the last 12 months.

PGOL's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCCF (65). This means that PGOL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGOLPMCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PGOL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BYDIF4.04N/A
N/A
Byd Electronic International Co Ltd.
MIESY10.10N/A
N/A
Mitsui E&S Co Ltd.
MFGCF1.20N/A
N/A
Mayfair Gold Corp.
DHCC0.06N/A
-0.15%
Diamondhead Casino Corp.
GHST0.06N/A
-3.33%
GHST World Inc.

PGOL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGOL and NCAUF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGOL and NCAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGOL
1D Price
Change %
PGOL100%
+35.16%
NCAUF - PGOL
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
PMCCF - PGOL
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNCKF - PGOL
-5%
Poorly correlated
+11.11%
PLMNF - PGOL
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNGZF - PGOL
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCCF and PPTA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCCF and PPTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCCF
1D Price
Change %
PMCCF100%
N/A
PPTA - PMCCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
EXNRF - PMCCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.85%
RRDMF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEXZF - PMCCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDIV - PMCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More