Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGNAX vs RSNRX
PGNAX vs RSNRX Comparison
Open Charts PGNAX vs RSNRX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources A
Price$56.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets689.35M
Victory Global Energy Transition A
Price$40.14
Change-$0.42 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.47M
PGNAX vs RSNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGNAX vs. RSNRX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGNAX is a Buy and RSNRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGNAX has more cash in the bank: 689M vs. RSNRX (392M). RSNRX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: RSNRX (1.36) vs PGNAX (0.87). PGNAX was incepted earlier than RSNRX: PGNAX (36 years) vs RSNRX (30 years). RSNRX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PGNAX (1.26). RSNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. PGNAX (31.00). RSNRX (6%) and PGNAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PGNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSNRX: PGNAX (1000) vs RSNRX (2500). RSNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.45 vs. PGNAX (3.61). RSNRX return over 5 years is better than : 381.40 vs. PGNAX (121.42).
| PGNAX | RSNRX | PGNAX / RSNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.48 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.54 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.994 | 30.198 | 40% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 689M | 392M | 176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.36 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | 39.45 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.19 | 50.01 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.42 | 381.40 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.43 | 108.01 | 79% |