PGLDF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
16M
ZCTSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PGLDF vs ZCTSF

Header iconPGLDF vs ZCTSF Comparison
Open Charts PGLDF vs ZCTSFBanner chart's image
P2 Gold
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$110.16K
Capitalization16M
Zacatecas Silver
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$117.63K
Capitalization20.46M
PGLDF vs ZCTSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZCTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGLDF vs. ZCTSF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGLDF is a Hold and ZCTSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (PGLDF: $0.11 vs. ZCTSF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: PGLDF and ZCTSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGLDF: 166% vs. ZCTSF: 149%
Market capitalization -- PGLDF: $16M vs. ZCTSF: $20.46M
PGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $16M. ZCTSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZCTSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PGLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZCTSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PGLDF is a better buy in the long-term than ZCTSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PGLDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZCTSF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZCTSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than ZCTSF.

Price Growth

PGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.45% price change this week, while ZCTSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZCTSF($20.5M) has a higher market cap than PGLDF($16M). PGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 157.590 vs. ZCTSF (7.817). ZCTSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12M vs. PGLDF (-12.93M). PGLDF has more cash in the bank: 378K vs. ZCTSF (71K). PGLDF (0) and ZCTSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PGLDFZCTSFPGLDF / ZCTSF
Capitalization16M20.5M78%
EBITDA-12.93M-12M108%
Gain YTD157.5907.8172,016%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash378K71K532%
Total Debt101KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGLDFZCTSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZCTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKZOF70.001.31
+1.91%
Akzo Nobel N.V.
ALBY26.75N/A
N/A
Community Capital Bancshares, Inc.
SRKE0.16N/A
N/A
Strake Inc.
ANIOY6.20-0.07
-1.07%
Acerinox S.A.
NWBO0.24-0.01
-3.86%
Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.

PGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGLDF and ZCTSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGLDF and ZCTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGLDF
1D Price
Change %
PGLDF100%
+3.79%
ZCTSF - PGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVRF - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
ALVLF - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.47%
EOGSF - PGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMGF - PGLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More

ZCTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZCTSF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZCTSF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZCTSF
1D Price
Change %
ZCTSF100%
N/A
VITFF - ZCTSF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SSVRF - ZCTSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
GSVRF - ZCTSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.68%
MRZLF - ZCTSF
26%
Poorly correlated
+6.86%
SLVRF - ZCTSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
More