Intraday BUY SELL Signals
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGJ vs VIPS
PGJ vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts PGJ vs VIPS
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$28.78
Change+$0.20 (+0.70%)
Volume$100
Net Assets131.44M
Vipshop Holdings
Price$17.14
Change+$0.39 (+2.33%)
Volume$400
Capitalization8.26B
PGJ vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGJ vs. VIPS commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGJ is a Hold and VIPS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PGJ | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| BZ - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | -3.79% | ||
| VIPS - PGJ | 72% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| ATHM - PGJ | 72% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | -2.39% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| BABAF - VIPS | 38% Loosely correlated | +4.63% | ||
More | ||||