Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGIRX vs RNPFX
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGIRX vs RNPFX
Polen Global Growth Investor
Price$20.23
Change-$7.31 (-26.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.35M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.69
Change-$2.65 (-3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGIRX vs. RNPFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGIRX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGIRX (217M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGIRX: RNPFX (1.24) vs PGIRX (0.00). PGIRX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGIRX (11 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). PGIRX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). PGIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGIRX: RNPFX (250) vs PGIRX (3000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. PGIRX (-24.85). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. PGIRX (-18.26).
| PGIRX | RNPFX | PGIRX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.45 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.45 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.819 | 1.630 | -357% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.85 | 13.29 | -187% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.94 | 42.76 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.26 | 18.14 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.38 | 131.36 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers