Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGIRX vs RNPFX
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGIRX vs RNPFX
Polen Global Growth Investor
Price$21.70
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.12M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.09
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGIRX vs. RNPFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGIRX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGIRX (260M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGIRX: RNPFX (0.69) vs PGIRX (0.00). PGIRX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGIRX (10 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). PGIRX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). PGIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGIRX: RNPFX (250) vs PGIRX (3000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.04 vs. PGIRX (-18.08). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.53 vs. PGIRX (-6.59).
| PGIRX | RNPFX | PGIRX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.46 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.46 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.054 | 14.587 | -110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.08 | 12.04 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.10 | 54.03 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.59 | 22.53 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.35 | 99.54 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement