Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGF vs VRP
PGF vs VRP Comparison
Open Charts PGF vs VRP
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Price$14.71
Change+$0.15 (+1.03%)
Volume$151.18K
Net Assets806.43M
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Price$24.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$621.63K
Net Assets2.18B
PGF vs VRP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGF vs. VRP commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGF is a StrongBuy and VRP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRP has more net assets: 2.18B vs. PGF (806M). VRP (5.493) and PGF (5.324) have matching annual dividend yield . PGF was incepted earlier than VRP: PGF (19 years) vs VRP (11 years). VRP (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PGF (0.54). PGF has a higher turnover VRP (16.00) vs VRP (16.00).
| PGF | VRP | PGF / VRP | |
| Gain YTD | 5.324 | 5.493 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 806M | 2.18B | 37% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.50 | 108% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 16.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 6.15 | 5.73 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PGF | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 23% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 31% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 24% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGF has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGF jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGF | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| HBANP - PGF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| NTRSO - PGF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| ACGLO - PGF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| ACGLN - PGF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| FITBO - PGF | 66% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
VRP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRP has been loosely correlated with VLYPN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRP jumps, then VLYPN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRP | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| VLYPN - VRP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| HBANL - VRP | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| VLYPO - VRP | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| ESGRF - VRP | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CNOBP - VRP | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||