Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGEYX vs RLBGX
PGEYX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts PGEYX vs RLBGX
George Putnam Balanced Y
Price$27.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.23
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
PGEYX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGEYX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGEYX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PGEYX (2.22B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than PGEYX: RLBGX (2.15) vs PGEYX (1.69). PGEYX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: PGEYX (31 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). PGEYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). PGEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). PGEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBGX: PGEYX (0) vs RLBGX (250). RLBGX (10.64) and PGEYX (10.37) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.65 vs. PGEYX (35.34).
| PGEYX | RLBGX | PGEYX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.25 | 272% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.25 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.825 | 9.228 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 2.15 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | 10.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 35.96 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.34 | 41.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.11 | 68.54 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement