Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGEYX vs RLBGX
PGEYX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts PGEYX vs RLBGX
George Putnam Balanced Y
Price$26.18
Change-$0.19 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$35.65
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PGEYX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGEYX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGEYX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PGEYX (2.14B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than PGEYX: RLBGX (2.23) vs PGEYX (1.76). PGEYX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: PGEYX (31 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). PGEYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). PGEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). PGEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBGX: PGEYX (0) vs RLBGX (250). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. PGEYX (5.07). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.35 vs. PGEYX (35.60).
| PGEYX | RLBGX | PGEYX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.25 | 272% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.25 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.217 | 4.592 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.23 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 5.63 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.53 | 33.78 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.60 | 40.35 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.55 | 60.87 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers