Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGEYX vs RLBCX
PGEYX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGEYX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced Y
Price$29.02
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.28
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
PGEYX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGEYX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGEYX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. PGEYX (2.32B). PGEYX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PGEYX (1.99) vs RLBCX (1.46). PGEYX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGEYX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PGEYX (0.68). PGEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGEYX (0) vs RLBCX (250). PGEYX (9.76) and RLBCX (9.58) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. PGEYX (35.17).
| PGEYX | RLBCX | PGEYX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.89 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.89 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.228 | 15.928 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 268B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.46 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 9.58 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.62 | 42.30 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.17 | 39.44 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.63 | 74.61 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers