PGCSF
Price
$3.06
Change
-$0.09 (-2.86%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RTO
Price
$29.89
Change
+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.03B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PGCSF vs RTO

Header iconPGCSF vs RTO Comparison
Open Charts PGCSF vs RTOBanner chart's image
Prosegur Cia De Securidad SA
Price$3.06
Change-$0.09 (-2.86%)
Volume$150
Capitalization1.64B
Rentokil Initial
Price$29.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Volume$317.21K
Capitalization15.03B
PGCSF vs RTO Comparison Chart in %
PGCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RTO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGCSF vs. RTO commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGCSF is a Hold and RTO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PGCSF: $3.06 vs. RTO: $29.89)
Brand notoriety: PGCSF and RTO are both not notable
PGCSF represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while RTO is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGCSF: 20% vs. RTO: 37%
Market capitalization -- PGCSF: $1.64B vs. RTO: $15.03B
PGCSF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $1.64B. RTO’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $15.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $43.06B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.18B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGCSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PGCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTO is a better buy in the long-term than PGCSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PGCSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PGCSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RTO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RTO is a better buy in the short-term than PGCSF.

Price Growth

PGCSF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RTO (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

RTO is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-0.34% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+1.33% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTO($15B) has a higher market cap than PGCSF($1.64B). RTO has higher P/E ratio than PGCSF: RTO (47.28) vs PGCSF (10.51). PGCSF YTD gains are higher at: 58.373 vs. RTO (21.386). RTO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.29B vs. PGCSF (549M). RTO has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. PGCSF (847M). PGCSF has less debt than RTO: PGCSF (2.48B) vs RTO (6.04B). RTO has higher revenues than PGCSF: RTO (6.92B) vs PGCSF (5B).
PGCSFRTOPGCSF / RTO
Capitalization1.64B15B11%
EBITDA549M1.29B43%
Gain YTD58.37321.386273%
P/E Ratio10.5147.2822%
Revenue5B6.92B72%
Total Cash847M1.69B50%
Total Debt2.48B6.04B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTO: Fundamental Ratings
RTO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGCSFRTO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PGCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RTO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBMRX26.560.11
+0.42%
Neuberger M/C Intrinsic Val R6
DDERX15.690.05
+0.32%
Nomura Wealth Builder R6
ABCSX21.340.06
+0.28%
AB Discovery Value C
VBPIX22.450.03
+0.13%
Vanguard Baillie GiffordGlbPstvImpStkInv
FIGRX57.27-0.01
-0.02%
Fidelity International Discovery

PGCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGCSF and LICN have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGCSF and LICN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGCSF
1D Price
Change %
PGCSF100%
N/A
LICN - PGCSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
JZ - PGCSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-10.16%
VCIG - PGCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+6.37%
SMX - PGCSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-7.36%
RTO - PGCSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

RTO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RTO has been loosely correlated with RELX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RTO jumps, then RELX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTO
1D Price
Change %
RTO100%
+0.13%
RELX - RTO
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CTAS - RTO
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
FA - RTO
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
RBA - RTO
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
DLB - RTO
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More