PG
Price
$168.06
Change
-$1.13 (-0.67%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
30 days until earnings call
UL
Price
$57.16
Change
-$0.39 (-0.68%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PG vs UL

Header iconPG vs UL Comparison
Open Charts PG vs ULBanner chart's image
Procter & Gamble
Price$168.06
Change-$1.13 (-0.67%)
Volume$22M
CapitalizationN/A
Unilever
Price$57.16
Change-$0.39 (-0.68%)
Volume$7.53M
CapitalizationN/A
PG vs UL Comparison Chart
Loading...
PG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PG vs. UL commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PG is a Hold and UL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (PG: $168.06 vs. UL: $57.16)
Brand notoriety: PG: Notable vs. UL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PG: 312% vs. UL: 327%
Market capitalization -- PG: $381.78B vs. UL: $125.74B
PG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $381.78B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $125.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $24.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the long-term than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the short-term than PG.

Price Growth

PG (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.75% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

PG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

UL is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-3.81% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($382B) has a higher market cap than UL($126B). PG has higher P/E ratio than UL: PG (26.90) vs UL (18.03). UL YTD gains are higher at: 21.884 vs. PG (17.539). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.6B vs. UL (12B). PG has more cash in the bank: 7.89B vs. UL (6.11B). UL has less debt than PG: UL (28.6B) vs PG (33.7B). PG has higher revenues than UL: PG (83.9B) vs UL (59.6B).
PGULPG / UL
Capitalization382B126B303%
EBITDA22.6B12B188%
Gain YTD17.53921.88480%
P/E Ratio26.9018.03149%
Revenue83.9B59.6B141%
Total Cash7.89B6.11B129%
Total Debt33.7B28.6B118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PG vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
PG
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8566
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1754
SMR RATING
1..100
3598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4315
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PG's Valuation (44) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (58). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (54). This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's SMR Rating (35) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (98). This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (54). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (43). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

PG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PG
1D Price
Change %
PG100%
-0.67%
CL - PG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
KMB - PG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
CHD - PG
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
CLX - PG
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
UL - PG
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
-0.68%
CL - UL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
PG - UL
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
CHD - UL
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
KMB - UL
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
EPC - UL
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More