PG
Price
$145.36
Change
-$1.35 (-0.92%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
342.82B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$59.09
Change
-$0.26 (-0.44%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
144.32B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PG vs UL

Header iconPG vs UL Comparison
Open Charts PG vs ULBanner chart's image
Procter & Gamble
Price$145.36
Change-$1.35 (-0.92%)
Volume$45.24K
Capitalization342.82B
Unilever
Price$59.09
Change-$0.26 (-0.44%)
Volume$40.6K
Capitalization144.32B
PG vs UL Comparison Chart in %
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PG vs. UL commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PG is a Hold and UL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PG: $146.71 vs. UL: $59.36)
Brand notoriety: PG: Notable vs. UL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PG: 109% vs. UL: 89%
Market capitalization -- PG: $342.82B vs. UL: $144.32B
PG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $342.82B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $144.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $342.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PG and UL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the short-term than UL.

Price Growth

PG (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

PG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

UL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.53% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($343B) has a higher market cap than UL($144B). UL has higher P/E ratio than PG: UL (22.79) vs PG (21.42). UL YTD gains are higher at: 8.305 vs. PG (-10.179). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.8B vs. UL (11.3B). PG has higher revenues than UL: PG (84.9B) vs UL (59.8B).
PGULPG / UL
Capitalization343B144B238%
EBITDA24.8B11.3B219%
Gain YTD-10.1798.305-123%
P/E Ratio21.4222.7994%
Revenue84.9B59.8B142%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt35.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PG vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
PG
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6263
SMR RATING
1..100
3097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8035
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UL's Valuation (27) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (43). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (63). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's SMR Rating (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for UL (97). This means that PG’s stock grew significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (61). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (80). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMUU64.361.38
+2.19%
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
RSP191.491.45
+0.76%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF
APCB29.900.05
+0.17%
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
IVVW45.440.06
+0.13%
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
VXZ55.72-0.04
-0.07%
iPath® B S&P 500® VIX Md-Trm Futs™ ETN

PG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PG
1D Price
Change %
PG100%
+0.58%
CL - PG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
KMB - PG
73%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
CHD - PG
67%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
UL - PG
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
CLX - PG
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
-0.29%
CL - UL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
PG - UL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
CHD - UL
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
KMB - UL
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
BDRFY - UL
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More