PG
Price
$154.36
Change
+$0.62 (+0.40%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
361.57B
59 days until earnings call
UL
Price
$61.00
Change
-$0.68 (-1.10%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
148.74B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PG vs UL

Header iconPG vs UL Comparison
Open Charts PG vs ULBanner chart's image
Procter & Gamble
Price$154.36
Change+$0.62 (+0.40%)
Volume$7.12M
Capitalization361.57B
Unilever
Price$61.00
Change-$0.68 (-1.10%)
Volume$2.01M
Capitalization148.74B
PG vs UL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PG vs. UL commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PG is a Hold and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (PG: $154.36 vs. UL: $61.00)
Brand notoriety: PG: Notable vs. UL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PG: 85% vs. UL: 91%
Market capitalization -- PG: $361.57B vs. UL: $148.74B
PG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $361.57B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $148.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $361.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PG and UL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the short-term than UL.

Price Growth

PG (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.55% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

PG is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

UL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.07% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($362B) has a higher market cap than UL($149B). PG (23.71) and UL (23.25) have similar P/E ratio . UL YTD gains are higher at: 10.336 vs. PG (-6.151).
PGULPG / UL
Capitalization362B149B243%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.15110.336-60%
P/E Ratio23.7123.25102%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt34.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PG vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
PG
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3644
SMR RATING
1..100
3297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7237
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UL's Valuation (26) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (40). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (44). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's SMR Rating (32) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (97). This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (59). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (72). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LUNC.X0.0000620.000004
+6.64%
Terra Classic cryptocurrency
FRONT.X0.1928330.009148
+4.98%
Frontier cryptocurrency
YGG.X0.1623260.004636
+2.94%
Yield Guild Games cryptocurrency
GTC.X0.353794-0.008091
-2.24%
Gitcoin cryptocurrency
ADA.X0.921282-0.022554
-2.39%
Cardano cryptocurrency

PG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PG
1D Price
Change %
PG100%
+0.40%
CL - PG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
CHD - PG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
KMB - PG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
CLX - PG
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
UL - PG
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
-0.26%
CL - UL
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
PG - UL
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
KMB - UL
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
CHD - UL
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
CLX - UL
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More